Forums - Synths & synthesis
Subject: MC303 or TR909 clone?
Original Message 1/24 09-Jul-00 @ 10:06 AM - MC303 or TR909 clone?
Any thoughts... Trev
Message 2/24 09-Jul-00 @ 03:36 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
Ape
Message 3/24 09-Jul-00 @ 03:42 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
Message 4/24 09-Jul-00 @ 05:30 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
BTW The 909 is mostly analog (kick, snare, rim, clap, toms) it only the hats and cymbals that are samples!
Message 5/24 10-Jul-00 @ 10:28 AM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
chunky
Message 7/24 10-Jul-00 @ 03:04 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
Message 8/24 10-Jul-00 @ 03:56 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
The clap, kick, snare, tom drums and rimshot are ANALOGUE. Cymbals / hats are DIGITAL. Don't bother fucking arguing - I should know because I've spent the last six months designing pcb's from the schematics...
Trev
Message 9/24 10-Jul-00 @ 04:23 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
I wouldn't enter a 909/303 debate, since I really know next to nothing about them technical-wise. And everyone knows that I speak in complete sentences, have correct punctiation, and sign my posts with:
-Nick
Message 10/24 10-Jul-00 @ 09:34 PM - RE: MC303 or TR909 clone?
I know someone who actually works for Roland in LA. and he tells me things all the time about inside shite. Take this for instance, the MC-303 has the same engine as the Sound Canvas!!! Different voices yes, but same technology.
Only thing that I can think that the MC-303 can do correctly, is trigger other instruments via MIDI. I know, because I do it all the time. But the voices are thinner than Kate Moss on Chrystal Meth. JUST WAY TOO THIN...
Someting to keep in mind. If you HAD to use a voice in that box, make sure you run it through a big fat analogue filter..
Pages: 1 2 3
There are 24 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum