Forums - Music tracks & feedback
Subject: Quality or quantity? more listeners
Original Message Date: 21-Jul-03 @ 05:48 AM - Quality or quantity? more listeners
at first it was a space issue, and some of you bitches still refused. NO MY MUSIC'S TOO GOOD FOR THAT
now, I believe more space is available, but the fact remains:
DIALUP CAN NOT STREAM 128/44
I went to try to listen to certain people's tracks, but theyre 128/44, and Im at pop's house right now.
not everyone is on broadband, folks
so do you snooty bitches want people to HEAR your tunes? or would you rather only people with broadband hear them.
fact is, if it sounds like pure shit at a lower quality, the mix IS shit. I once encoded an uberzone track to 24/22 mono, just to see, and it sounded ing GREAT.
thnk about it
Message 21/28 22-Jul-03 @ 11:12 AM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
only 2 links on google. available for download there ^
Message 22/28 22-Jul-03 @ 11:21 AM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
Dan wrote this song for Phyl on their 25th Anniversary, title is,,,, "If I had killed you when I wanted to, I'd be out of jail by now."
sadly it's not available for a list3n
Message 24/28 23-Jul-03 @ 02:29 AM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
i've often encoded at 40 and found myself just over the 2mb mark and so went for the lower rate.
this is a good thing....3mb~
Message 25/28 23-Jul-03 @ 10:02 AM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
Can mac's play .wma files tho? (I gotta get a mac soon to bug-test the whole site for mac browsers)
Message 26/28 23-Jul-03 @ 02:27 PM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
a young friend told me it's a windows-only format as yet.
and cool for getting the mac to test-run site efficiency issues.
still no back-button....well...it works at appx.30%.
and still no forum list on the side whilst INside the thread!
![](smiley.gif)
i still miss that!
Message 27/28 25-Jul-03 @ 02:34 PM Edit: 25-Jul-03 | 02:37 PM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
Unfortunatly, the more experimental non-songform stuff does rely on processing that can be hidden by low-rez encoding. Still, the general idea remains and, in the spirit of experimenting, choosing frequencies and manipulating them to take ADVANTAGE of aliasing can make low-rez rendering an integral part of the piece. Using exaggerated panning can overcome the stereo field problems and, again, become integral to the piece.
Is your cache half empty or half full???
Message 28/28 27-Jul-03 @ 09:12 PM - RE: Quality or quantity? more listeners
![](smiley.gif)
so yet again I tried to check DJ RCL's tunes, and couldnt
hmmmm
Pages: 1 2 3
There are 28 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum