 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Forums - The lounge
Subject: 911 video manipulation/hologram
Original Message 1/57 10-Mar-04 @ 09:59 AM - 911 video manipulation/hologram
The video showing the supposed crash of flight 175 into the south tower depicts the plane seemingly melting into the building, with absolutely no debris or explosion upon impact. View the following frames in succession at www.thewebfairy.org/911.... one can clearly see the 'plane' sliding into the building as if it were an apparition. One can only conclude, either the footage was doctored before release (live-video manipulation technology exists), or some type of military-grade was employed. Note: this is not a track of light and shadow, nor is this phenomenon exclusive to this video. The same effect appears in several different versions from varying angles.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/004.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/005.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/006.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/007.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/009.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/011.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/012.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/013.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/016.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/032.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/004.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/005.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/006.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/007.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/009.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/011.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/012.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/013.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/016.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane2/032.jpg
Message 3/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:10 AM Edit: 10-Mar-04 | 10:11 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
odd, yes... but what's your point if several different angles/video systems captured this event?
"or some type of military-grade was employed"
was an expletive deleted? If not, this doesn't make sense. What are you saying.
"or some type of military-grade was employed"
was an expletive deleted? If not, this doesn't make sense. What are you saying.
Message 4/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:20 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
lol - so?... you're proposing some new loopy theory?
perhaps it's just the consequence of a thousand tons of plane hitting a flimsy steel structure covered with bolt-on face-plates at cruising speed.
things dont IMPLODE outwardly, you probably watch too much action movies & were expecting a huge explosion John Woo style mebbe?
modern buldings like that are just a steel frame with bolted-on exterior plates, there's no bricks, or what have you
perhaps it's just the consequence of a thousand tons of plane hitting a flimsy steel structure covered with bolt-on face-plates at cruising speed.
things dont IMPLODE outwardly, you probably watch too much action movies & were expecting a huge explosion John Woo style mebbe?
modern buldings like that are just a steel frame with bolted-on exterior plates, there's no bricks, or what have you
Message 5/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:22 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
"odd, yes... but what's your point if several different angles/video systems captured this event?
"or some type of military-grade was employed"
was an expletive deleted? If not, this doesn't make sense. What are you saying. "
I apologize. I meant to say "military-grade hologram." Possibly a cruise missile (AGM-86C) with an attached holographic projector.
Then again, a more conservative theory is that the video could have simply been doctored. But that begs the question, why was it doctored? And how could all of the networks possibly manage to depict a similar-looking plane doing a similarly anomalous maneuver, in so short a span of time. Perhaps the CIA distributed the 'official footage' for the networks in advance? But then why make it so shoddy?
All in all, what is depicted defies every known law of physics. A 757 going upwards of 500mph simply cannot effortlessly glide into a skyscraper, encountering absolutely no resistance, and incurring absolutely no damage to the cockpit, fuselage, or wings in the process.
"or some type of military-grade was employed"
was an expletive deleted? If not, this doesn't make sense. What are you saying. "
I apologize. I meant to say "military-grade hologram." Possibly a cruise missile (AGM-86C) with an attached holographic projector.
Then again, a more conservative theory is that the video could have simply been doctored. But that begs the question, why was it doctored? And how could all of the networks possibly manage to depict a similar-looking plane doing a similarly anomalous maneuver, in so short a span of time. Perhaps the CIA distributed the 'official footage' for the networks in advance? But then why make it so shoddy?
All in all, what is depicted defies every known law of physics. A 757 going upwards of 500mph simply cannot effortlessly glide into a skyscraper, encountering absolutely no resistance, and incurring absolutely no damage to the cockpit, fuselage, or wings in the process.
Message 6/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:32 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
"lol - so?... you're proposing some new loopy theory?
perhaps it's just the consequence of a thousand tons of plane hitting a flimsy steel structure covered with bolt-on face-plates at cruising speed.
things dont IMPLODE outwardly, you probably watch too much action movies & were expecting a huge explosion John Woo style mebbe?
modern buldings like that are just a steel frame with bolted-on exterior plates, there's no bricks, or what have you "
Eh? "Bolt-on face plates" ? hardly. more like rows upon rows of reinforced steel and concrete. the plane should have either buckled or at least sustained considerable damage upon colliding with that kind of mass.
Also, the 'plane' was completely silhoutted in shadow when flying from the east. Footage taken in the direction of sunlight shows the plane completed shrouded in shadow (bear in mind there was nothing obstructing the incidence of light at that time) before it, miraculously, begins to illuminate before careening into the building.
Why does flight 175 appear translucent in the CNN footage?
Why does it depict a silver plane when all United Airlines craft are dark blue and grey?
perhaps it's just the consequence of a thousand tons of plane hitting a flimsy steel structure covered with bolt-on face-plates at cruising speed.
things dont IMPLODE outwardly, you probably watch too much action movies & were expecting a huge explosion John Woo style mebbe?
modern buldings like that are just a steel frame with bolted-on exterior plates, there's no bricks, or what have you "
Eh? "Bolt-on face plates" ? hardly. more like rows upon rows of reinforced steel and concrete. the plane should have either buckled or at least sustained considerable damage upon colliding with that kind of mass.
Also, the 'plane' was completely silhoutted in shadow when flying from the east. Footage taken in the direction of sunlight shows the plane completed shrouded in shadow (bear in mind there was nothing obstructing the incidence of light at that time) before it, miraculously, begins to illuminate before careening into the building.
Why does flight 175 appear translucent in the CNN footage?
Why does it depict a silver plane when all United Airlines craft are dark blue and grey?
Message 7/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:38 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
"Then again, a more conservative theory is that the video could have simply been doctored. But that begs the question, why was it doctored?"
well why not? the conspiracy theorists need something to keep em busy.....i mean why fake a moon landing? or why pretend the moon landing was fake?
greg
well why not? the conspiracy theorists need something to keep em busy.....i mean why fake a moon landing? or why pretend the moon landing was fake?
greg
Message 8/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:39 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
"things dont IMPLODE outwardly, you probably watch too much action movies & were expecting a huge explosion John Woo style mebbe?"
Well perhaps we weren't watching the same footage. Because there WAS a huge explosion, only it occurred 40 frames (most explosions occur 2 frames after impact) after the plane was immersed inside the building.
please explain what you mean by 'implode outwardly.'
Well perhaps we weren't watching the same footage. Because there WAS a huge explosion, only it occurred 40 frames (most explosions occur 2 frames after impact) after the plane was immersed inside the building.
please explain what you mean by 'implode outwardly.'
Message 9/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:44 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
""Then again, a more conservative theory is that the video could have simply been doctored. But that begs the question, why was it doctored?"
well why not? the conspiracy theorists need something to keep em busy.....i mean why fake a moon landing? or why pretend the moon landing was fake?
greg "
well, no need for theories anymore. that 911 was an elaborate hoax has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt already. Anyone who's devoted more than a cursory glance at the inconsistencies in the official story has come to that conclusion.
I'd just like someone to provide a competent physical analysis of the second impact. To me, it beggars belief.
well why not? the conspiracy theorists need something to keep em busy.....i mean why fake a moon landing? or why pretend the moon landing was fake?
greg "
well, no need for theories anymore. that 911 was an elaborate hoax has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt already. Anyone who's devoted more than a cursory glance at the inconsistencies in the official story has come to that conclusion.
I'd just like someone to provide a competent physical analysis of the second impact. To me, it beggars belief.
Message 10/57 10-Mar-04 @ 10:48 AM - RE: 911 video manipulation/hologram
and why the brief, localized flash right before the point of entry, which then promptly vanishes?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
There are 57 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum
