aaa speaking of Michael Moore..... - The lounge forums
skin: 1 2 3 4 |  Login | Join Dancetech |

dancetech forums

01-Jul-2024

Info-line:   [synths]    [sampler]    [drumbox]    [effects]    [mixers]     [mics]     [monitors]    [pc-h/ware]    [pc-s/ware]    [plugins]    -    [links]    [tips]

Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About dancetech forums Forum home Start a new topic

Forums   -   The lounge

Subject: speaking of Michael Moore.....


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Original Message                 Date: 05-May-04  @  04:50 AM   -   speaking of Michael Moore.....

dissonance

Posts: 342

Link?:  Link
File?:  No file




May 5, 2004
Disney Forbidding Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush
By JIM RUTENBERG

ASHINGTON, May 4 — The Walt Disney Company is blocking its Miramax division from distributing a new documentary by Michael Moore that harshly criticizes President Bush, executives at both Disney and Miramax said Tuesday.

The film, "Fahrenheit 911," links Mr. Bush and prominent Saudis — including the family of Osama bin Laden — and criticizes Mr. Bush's actions before and after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Disney, which bought Miramax more than a decade ago, has a contractual agreement with the Miramax principals, Bob and Harvey Weinstein, allowing it to prevent the company from distributing films under certain circumstances, like an excessive budget or an NC-17 rating.

Executives at Miramax, who became principal investors in Mr. Moore's project last spring, do not believe that this is one of those cases, people involved in the production of the film said. If a compromise is not reached, these people said, the matter could go to mediation, though neither side is said to want to travel that route.

In a statement, Matthew Hiltzik, a spokesman for Miramax, said: "We're discussing the issue with Disney. We're looking at all of our options and look forward to resolving this amicably."

But Disney executives indicated that they would not budge from their position forbidding Miramax to be the distributor of the film in North America. Overseas rights have been sold to a number of companies.

"We advised both the agent and Miramax in May of 2003 that the film would not be distributed by Miramax," said Zenia Mucha, a company spokeswoman, referring to Mr. Moore's agent. "That decision stands."

Disney came under heavy criticism from conservatives last May after the disclosure that Miramax had agreed to finance the film when Icon Productions, Mel Gibson's studio, backed out.

Mr. Moore's agent, Ari Emanuel, said that Michael D. Eisner, Disney's chief executive, asked him last spring to pull out of the deal with Miramax. Mr. Emanuel said Mr. Eisner expressed concern that it would endanger tax breaks Disney receives for its theme park, hotels and other ventures in Florida, where Mr. Bush's brother, Jeb, is governor.

"Michael Eisner asked me not to sell this movie to Harvey Weinstein; that doesn't mean I listened to him," Mr. Emanuel said. "He definitely indicated there were tax incentives he was getting for the Disney corporation and that's why he didn't want me to sell it to Miramax. He didn't want a Disney company involved."

Disney executives deny that accusation, though they said their displeasure over the deal was made clear to Miramax and Mr. Emanuel.

A senior Disney executive elaborated that the company has the right to quash Miramax's distribution of films if it deems their distribution to be against the interests of the company. Mr. Moore's film, the executive said, is deemed to be against Disney's interests not because of the company's business dealings with the government but because Disney caters to families of all political stripes and believes Mr. Moore's film could alienate many.

"It's not in the interest of any major corporation to be dragged into a highly charged partisan political battle," this executive said.

Miramax is free to seek another distributor in North America, although such a deal would force it to share profits and be a blow to Harvey Weinstein, a big donor to Democrats.

Mr. Moore, who will present the film at the Cannes film festival this month, criticized Disney's decision in an interview on Tuesday, saying, "At some point the question has to be asked, `Should this be happening in a free and open society where the monied interests essentially call the shots regarding the information that the public is allowed to see?' "

Mr. Moore's films, like "Roger and Me" and "Bowling for Columbine," are often a political lightning rod, as he sets out to skewer what he says are the misguided priorities of conservatives and big business. They have also often performed well at the box office. His most recent movie, "Bowling for Columbine," took in about $22 million in North America for United Artists. His books, like "Stupid White Men," a jeremiad against the Bush administration that has sold more than a million copies, have also been lucrative.

Mr. Moore does not disagree that "Fahrenheit 911" is highly charged, but he took issue with the description of it as partisan. "If this is partisan in any way it is partisan on the side of the poor and working people in this country who provide fodder for this war machine," he said.

Mr. Moore said the film describes financial connections between the Bush family and its associates and prominent Saudi Arabian families that go back three decades. He said it closely explores the government's decision to help members of the bin Laden family leave the United States immediately after the 2001 attacks. The film includes comments from American soldiers on the ground in Iraq expressing disillusionment with the war, he said.

Mr. Moore initially planned on producing the film with Mr. Gibson's company, but last May it pulled out.

"The project wasn't right for Icon," said Alan Nierob, a spokesman for Icon, adding that the decision had nothing to do with politics.

Miramax stepped in immediately. The company had previously produced one of Mr. Moore's films, 1997's "The Big One." In return for providing most of the new film's $6 million budget, Miramax was positioned to distribute the film.

While Disney's objections were made clear early on, one executive who spoke on condition of anonymity said the Miramax leadership hoped it would be able to prevail upon Disney to sign off on distribution -— which would ideally hoping happen this summer, before the election and when political interest is high.




[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 31/69             14-May-04  @  12:32 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

Cheeseburger

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



He's a fat pig who's also the LARGEST windbag in media clips


nasty!!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 32/69             14-May-04  @  03:32 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

psylichon

Posts: 4573

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



gosh imagine how much more credible he'd be if he just lost a few pounds... golly...



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 33/69             14-May-04  @  03:54 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

cheddar

Posts: 673

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



shut it skinny



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 34/69             14-May-04  @  04:47 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

psylichon

Posts: 4573

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



No seriously, I don't know how anyone takes that guy seriously... all his ranting on the government and big business and guns and such. How can he be so liberal AND fat??? It just boggles the mind.

Until the hypocrisy of his weight issue is eliminated, I cannot accept anything this man says as "truth"



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 35/69             14-May-04  @  06:30 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

craig

Posts: 2707

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



It is disturbing that pretty much everyone who tries to tear the man down has to mention his weight.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 36/69             14-May-04  @  07:52 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

nobody

Posts: 81

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



right?

who cares how "fat" he is

my doctor weighs 400 lb. easily, and it's a glandular problem..

not saying moore has a glandular problem.. i see moore as an editorialist, more than documentaian.. for a real documentarian, i'd say errol morris.. of course, he's not too into modern politics, but his work is quite wonderful - check Fast, Cheap, & Out of Control



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 37/69             14-May-04  @  09:41 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

* compulsary

Posts:

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



couldn't be arsed to create a new topic

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0512-13.htm


altho'it deserves one



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 38/69             14-May-04  @  10:01 PM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

mcc>

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



good one compulsary.
i'm glad SOMEONE FINALLY posted that vonnegut link.

next to mark twain that man is.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 39/69             15-May-04  @  02:12 AM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

Pizza with Corn Topping

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Fat has nothing to do with credibility as he never really had much



Again, he's a nasty windbag that needs his hot air let out :lol



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 40/69             15-May-04  @  03:04 AM   -   RE: speaking of Michael Moore.....

pict

Posts: 1005

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Maybe we're all just part of a vast planetary chemical reprocessing cycle!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

There are 69 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum





Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)