Forums - Computer music & technology
Subject: Optimal Spec Question
Viewing all 9 messages - View by pages of 10: 1
Original Message 1/9 18-Aug-03 @ 11:46 PM - Optimal Spec Question
Message 2/9 18-Aug-03 @ 11:53 PM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
other than what ya got, I would recommend a high quality soundcard with solid, low-latency drivers. What interface are you using now?
Oh, and how fast was your old processor?
more memory would be good if you ever plan on using soft synths and samplers.
Message 3/9 19-Aug-03 @ 06:45 AM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
thanks by the way
ps, how easy is a k7s5a bios flash?
Message 4/9 19-Aug-03 @ 02:03 PM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
BTW Psy - You're right I believe. 2600s should run on the k7s5a. Nice little motherboard - I think I'm going to buy a second for my gaming and general purpose machine. F1 2002 and Vice City run too slowly
Message 5/9 20-Aug-03 @ 07:55 AM Edit: 20-Aug-03 | 07:56 AM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
For some reason, with WinXP and the K7S5A, it WILL NOT allow you to enable DMA on your drives by default. You need to download a utility called SISIDE.EXE (which is wicked hard to find, but i will search my favs for the link if you want it) that will enable UDMA for all drives that support it.
But this is all ex post facto since you're onto another board, innit. But you're not going to notice much more improvement beyond what you got now. To get real horsepower, I would get a second, medium-power computer to run softsynths and use a switcher (of course, you need new audio and midi hardware then.... ) I'm curious what your leap to a 2500 netted you in horsepower, though, as I'm considering dropping a 2600 in my ecs now
I'm curious as to why you're running at 24-bit when the mkii 2408 only does 16-bit? or am i wrong? I thought the mk3 went up to 24.... or maybe just to 96k. nevermind. I dunno. But are your samples all 24-bit?
Message 6/9 20-Aug-03 @ 07:57 AM Edit: 20-Aug-03 | 07:57 AM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
Message 7/9 20-Aug-03 @ 01:56 PM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
Message 8/9 20-Aug-03 @ 06:45 PM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
the jump to 2500 made, well, a pretty huge difference, considering all the problems with skipping that disappeared.
The MOTU2408mkII certainly records audio at 24bit, the mkI does 20bit.
But when You're running 30 tracks of Stereo 24 bit audio (each about 5-8 minutes in length), your cpu has a lot to deal with. This is why i believe the jump to 2500 fixed my issues. The rendering time, etc. is obviously faster too, but I'm a patient man. I just need enough headroom to be able to make as large and elaborate mix as I want to without any technical inhibitions.
Most of the tracks I record are stereo 24bit, again: 4-7 minutes in length. very few are 16bit unless they're ghost tracks or downloaded samples. (not a lot of sampling going on, mostly music, long compositions).
PSY: when you run 30-35 tracks on your 1800, are they stereo 24bit? all playing at once? peculiar.
either way, this is all great help. I have an extra 2500 laying around, perhaps I'll throw it in the world's most compatible board (which is lonely in a box), the K7s5a. if I can successfully do all i want to do and not have to use this WPCREDIT stuff for my VIA board, i'll be a happy(er) camper!
thanks again for the thoughts!
99Devils: what do you have running in your k7s5a to run 45 tracks? and again. . what kind of tracks are you using? (st/mon, bitrate, length)? and What SOFTWARE are you guys using? i don't suppose some programs interact better with some hardware? OoooOh. thoughts again please.
(this forum is the planet's most helpful resource.)
Message 9/9 20-Aug-03 @ 10:11 PM - RE: Optimal Spec Question
Viewing all 9 messages - View by pages of 10: 1
There are 9 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum